Review China's current relevant policies for distributed PV industry. Use historical data from real PV projects to calculate the generating capacity. Discuss the impact of each policy variable on economic performance.
Development of distributed solar photovoltaics mainly benefited from the incentive policies in China. Currently the cost of PV power generation is still higher than traditional energy sources. China's PV industry is incapable of competing in the energy market without policy intervention.
China has a strong share of distributed solar PV, with close to 225 GW out of 536 GW, reflecting a diverse and robust deployment and bringing affordable clean electricity alongside greater energy independence.
Cumulative and newly installed grid-connected capacities of China's distributed solar photovoltaics from 2009 to 2014. Source, . However, China's current distributed PV industry still has a series of problems and restrictions. Distributed PV power generation remains in its infancy whose development mainly relies on policy support.
As a new way to generate and utilize energy, distributed PV can greatly improve the generating capacity of the same scale PV power station. It can also effectively solve the problem of power loss during transport. The development of distributed PV industry has provided favorable conditions to realize China's energy reform.
It is foreseeable that in the next 5–10 years, distributed PV industry will take off in China. China's distributed PV power generation will become the main stream of PV industry in the near future. 5. Conclusion and recommendations
China's National Energy Administration (NEA) has released new draft rules to reshape the distributed-generation solar market. China's NEA has released “Draft Management Measures for Distributed Solar Power Development and Construction, Edition for Public Consultation.”
This paper takes Tianqi Lithium Corp's acquisition of SQM as the research subject, conducting a detailed analysis of the motives behind the M&A. Subsequently, financial indicators are.
Based on the year when the 18 listed companies in the lithium battery industry first implemented M&A during the sample observation period, the merger value is 1 after the year of the first merger, and the merger value is 0 for the subsequent mergers.
On the one hand, non-technology-based mergers in the lithium battery industry mainly entail vertical mergers. Vertical mergers refer to the acquisition of companies that are upstream or downstream of the acquiring company, with a direct relationship in regard to production processes or business operations.
Heterogeneity analysis has revealed that technological M&A crucially facilitates the improvement of technological innovation levels among listed companies in the lithium battery industry.
For the existing research on the lithium battery industry M&A, only a limited number of scholars have investigated the characteristics and driving factors of M&A. Monge et al. (2018) considered the M&A of US oil and gas companies in the lithium battery industry.
Heterogeneity Analysis When listed companies in the lithium battery industry implement M&A strategies, they can opt for either technical mergers or non-technical M&A. Non-technical M&A mainly extend upstream through vertical M&A to ensure the supply of raw materials and reduce costs.
Compared with the estimated results in columns (1) and (2), the core explanatory variables, the estimated coefficient of a merge is smaller, and the statistical significance is significantly reduced, which indicates that technology M&A are the main driving factor for the technological enhancement of listed companies in the lithium battery industry.
Contact us for competitive quotes on any of our EMS platforms, inverters, PCS systems, and energy storage solutions
Get a Quote